A study was conducted in the North East state of Para in Brazil. The study concluded in the last 25 years there was numerous evidence of natural impacts in the flood and erosion process. Strategies and measures of population adaptation have been implemented, but had limited success. In order to subsidize the Coastal Zone Management Program of Para, natural and socio-economic vulnerability of costal zone buy means of a Geographical Information System based composite coastal vulnerability index. In spite of the data problems and shortcomings, using ESRI's 3.2 program, the CVI score, to classify, weight and combine a number of 16 separate natural and socio-economic variables to create a single indicator provides a reliable measure of differences among regions and communities that are exposed to similar ranges of hazards. The results are presented in 3 maps referred to as Natural, Socioeconomic and Total Vulnerability.
Resource:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40928754?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08920758709362013
Resource:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40928754?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08920758709362013
I use GIS all the time...great software to map anything...
ReplyDeleteThe human attempt to prevent coastal erosion when we have altered the way the process would naturally occur looks pretty much futile. In sand beaches the most sure way to maintain their existence looks to be replenishing sand yet this is costly and in the even of large storms it the brunt of the work can be undone. The use of mapping software surely helps in understand what exactly is going on and where should coastal restoration efforts be focused.
ReplyDeleteHi Ryan,
ReplyDeleteGreat post, I personally love Brazil. To think that so much can happen there since the country is mostly a coast. The information abut the GIS was new to me, and I tried it and leaned a lot. Keep up the good work!
Joelle